[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101109090123.6a12f3f2.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 09:01:23 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: dave@....org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250: fix uninitialized compiler warning
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:55:23 -0300 Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@....org>
>
> This addresses:
>
> CC [M] drivers/serial/8250.o
> drivers/serial/8250.c: In function ‘serial8250_shutdown’:
> drivers/serial/8250.c:1696: warning: ‘i’ may be used uninitialized in this function
> drivers/serial/8250.c:1696: note: ‘i’ was declared here
so in your analysis of this compiler warning, was the warning correct & justified,
or was it false? I.e., is the init to NULL needed?
If it was false, could we just quieten the warning by using:
struct irq_info *unitialized_var(i);
plus #include <linux/compiler.h> ?
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@....org>
> ---
> drivers/serial/8250.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/serial/8250.c b/drivers/serial/8250.c
> index 4d8e14b..f734eee 100644
> --- a/drivers/serial/8250.c
> +++ b/drivers/serial/8250.c
> @@ -1693,7 +1693,7 @@ static int serial_link_irq_chain(struct uart_8250_port *up)
>
> static void serial_unlink_irq_chain(struct uart_8250_port *up)
> {
> - struct irq_info *i;
> + struct irq_info *i = NULL;
> struct hlist_node *n;
> struct hlist_head *h;
>
> --
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists