linux-kernel - [PATCH] fanotify: correct broken ref counting in case adding a mark failed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101109171816.GB14516@lsanfilippo.unix.rd.tt.avira.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Nov 2010 18:18:16 +0100
From:	Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
To:	eparis@...hat.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fanotify: correct broken ref counting in case adding a
	mark failed


    If adding a mount or inode mark failed fanotify_free_mark() is called explicitly.
    But at this time the mark has already been put into the destroy list of the
    fsnotify_mark kernel thread. If the thread is too slow it will try to decrease
    the reference of a mark, that has already been freed by fanotify_free_mark().
    (If its fast enough it will only decrease the marks ref counter from 2 to 1 - note
    that the counter has been increased to 2 in add_mark() - which has practically no
    effect.)
    This patch fixes the ref counting by not calling free_mark() explicitly, but
    decreasing the ref counter and rely on the fsnotify_mark thread to cleanup in
    case adding the mark has failed.

Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
---
This patch applies against commit 02478ec882e057e33fbdd8f1ba245fdfa5a355fb
of branch 'origin/for-next' from git.infradead.org/users/eparis/notify.git

diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
index a7a9d84..090790a 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
@@ -605,11 +605,10 @@ static int fanotify_add_vfsmount_mark(struct fsnotify_group *group,
 {
 	struct fsnotify_mark *fsn_mark;
 	__u32 added;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	fsn_mark = fsnotify_find_vfsmount_mark(group, mnt);
 	if (!fsn_mark) {
-		int ret;
-
 		if (atomic_read(&group->num_marks) > group->fanotify_data.max_marks)
 			return -ENOSPC;
 
@@ -619,17 +618,16 @@ static int fanotify_add_vfsmount_mark(struct fsnotify_group *group,
 
 		fsnotify_init_mark(fsn_mark, fanotify_free_mark);
 		ret = fsnotify_add_mark(fsn_mark, group, NULL, mnt, 0);
-		if (ret) {
-			fanotify_free_mark(fsn_mark);
-			return ret;
-		}
+		if (ret) 
+			goto err;
 	}
 	added = fanotify_mark_add_to_mask(fsn_mark, mask, flags);
-	fsnotify_put_mark(fsn_mark);
+
 	if (added & ~mnt->mnt_fsnotify_mask)
 		fsnotify_recalc_vfsmount_mask(mnt);
-
-	return 0;
+err:
+	fsnotify_put_mark(fsn_mark);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int fanotify_add_inode_mark(struct fsnotify_group *group,
@@ -638,6 +636,7 @@ static int fanotify_add_inode_mark(struct fsnotify_group *group,
 {
 	struct fsnotify_mark *fsn_mark;
 	__u32 added;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	pr_debug("%s: group=%p inode=%p\n", __func__, group, inode);
 
@@ -653,8 +652,6 @@ static int fanotify_add_inode_mark(struct fsnotify_group *group,
 
 	fsn_mark = fsnotify_find_inode_mark(group, inode);
 	if (!fsn_mark) {
-		int ret;
-
 		if (atomic_read(&group->num_marks) > group->fanotify_data.max_marks)
 			return -ENOSPC;
 
@@ -664,16 +661,16 @@ static int fanotify_add_inode_mark(struct fsnotify_group *group,
 
 		fsnotify_init_mark(fsn_mark, fanotify_free_mark);
 		ret = fsnotify_add_mark(fsn_mark, group, inode, NULL, 0);
-		if (ret) {
-			fanotify_free_mark(fsn_mark);
-			return ret;
-		}
+		if (ret) 
+			goto err;
 	}
 	added = fanotify_mark_add_to_mask(fsn_mark, mask, flags);
-	fsnotify_put_mark(fsn_mark);
+
 	if (added & ~inode->i_fsnotify_mask)
 		fsnotify_recalc_inode_mask(inode);
-	return 0;
+err:
+	fsnotify_put_mark(fsn_mark);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /* fanotify syscalls */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/