linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] cgroups: Shrink struct cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTim6d1fQLZbkmZST3PTN0RMSs3m=oossF81pYBn9@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Nov 2010 13:05:31 -0800
From:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
To:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	"akpm >> Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] cgroups: Shrink struct cgroup_subsys

On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> bool active;
> bool disabled;
> ...
>
> ?
>
> With alignment 5-8 bool values == 8 bytes in 64-bit machine, compared to
> 4 bytes with the approach this patch takes.

I meant specifying it as:

bool active:1;
bool disabled:1;

i.e. keeping the bit-sized flags but also keeping the bool semantics.
Having said that, I'm not really sure why saving 12 bytes per
subsystem is worth a patch.

Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/