[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1011091327420.7730@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 13:31:48 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] memcg: fix unit mismatch in memcg oom limit
calculation
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Greg Thelen wrote:
> Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> writes:
>
> > Adding the number of swap pages to the byte limit of a memory control
> > group makes no sense. Convert the pages to bytes before adding them.
> >
> > The only user of this code is the OOM killer, and the way it is used
> > means that the error results in a higher OOM badness value. Since the
> > cgroup limit is the same for all tasks in the cgroup, the error should
> > have no practical impact at the moment.
> >
> > But let's not wait for future or changing users to trip over it.
>
> Thanks for the fix.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
>
Nice catch, but it's done in the opposite way: the oom killer doesn't use
byte limits but page limits. So this needs to be
(res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_LIMIT) >> PAGE_SHIFT) +
total_swap_pages;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists