[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1289391709.2191.102.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:21:49 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] perf stat: Use event group to simulate PMI on
PMI-less hardware counter
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 14:15 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> Some hardware counters(for example, Intel RAPL) can't generate interrupt
> when overflow. So we need to simulate the interrupt to periodically
> record the counter values. Otherwise, the counter may overflow and the
> wrong value is read.
>
> This patch uses event group to simulate PMI as suggested by Peter
> Zijlstra, http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128220854801819&w=2
>
> create_group_counters() will create a group with 2 events, one hrtimer
> based event as the group leader, and the other event to count. The
> hrtimer is fired periodically, so the sibling event can record its
> counter value periodically as well.
I'm terribly confused here....
- you introduce perf_event_attr:pmi_simulate, but then you never
implement it -- nor do we need it afaict.
- you use grouped counters for perf-stat, perf-stat doesn't use
sampling so I don't see a need to group events to simulate the PMI.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists