[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinVp4C9bRW6=EMHwh1UyeadFbOXKe1aDsxknJf8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 01:12:55 +0100
From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...onical.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/49] vcs: add poll/fasync support
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 20:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
>
> The /dev/vcs* devices are used, amongst other things, by accessibility
> applications such as BRLTTY to display the screen content onto refreshable
> braille displays. Currently this is performed by constantly reading from
> /dev/vcsa0 whether or not the screen content has changed. Given the
> default braille refresh rate of 25 times per second, this easily qualifies
> as the biggest source of wake-up events preventing laptops from entering
> deeper power saving states.
>
> To avoid this periodic polling, let's add support for select()/poll() and
> SIGIO with the /dev/vcs* devices. The implemented semantic is to report
> data availability whenever the corresponding vt has seen some update after
> the last read() operation. The application still has to lseek() back
> as usual in order to read() the new data.
Shouldn't it raise POLLPRI/POLLERR then, when it's not about new data
to read? We do this for several files in the kernel where we just want
to wakup someone, but the pretty well-defined semantics of poll()
don't apply.
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists