lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:38:35 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
	"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] perf: Enable group siblings on exec if
 attr::enable_on_exec set

On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 22:17 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 20:19 +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 14:15 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> > > Currently, only group leader is enabled on exec.
> > 
> > That's enough, right? If all sibling events are already enabled enabling
> > the group leader makes the whole thing go.
> 
> No.
> 
> If the event group is disabled by default("perf stat" case) and will be
> enabled at next exec, then actually only the group leader will be
> enabled , because all siblings are explicitly disabled(->state ==
> PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF). So the siblings will never be enabled.

Right, so what I was saying is, don't disable all the siblings by
default, so that only the group leader will be disabled. In that case
nothing will get scheduled because the group leader is not enabled.

So: {disabled, enabled, enabled} will not actually get scheduled and the
group as a whole is effectively disabled. Once the enabled_on_exec flips
the group leader to 'enabled' the whole group becomes enabled.

I don't mind the patch too much (although I would like to avoid that
double sibling iteration in both group_enable_on_exec() and
__perf_event_mark_enabled()), but I think it can already work as is.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ