linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/6] fs: icache RCU free inodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101110144721.GC7205@basil.fritz.box>
Date:	Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:47:21 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/6] fs: icache RCU free inodes

> It is in the inode_init_once pile, so yes it has to be returned
> to the allocator initialized.

The kmem_cache_create()s in the file systems don't pass constructors
today. So I don't see how this could work reliably.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/