[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101110145511.GA22073@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:55:11 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, dave b <db.pub.mail@...il.com>,
Sanjoy Mahajan <sanjoy@...n.edu>,
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Aidar Kultayev <the.aidar@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Steven Barrett <damentz@...il.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.36 io bring the system to its knees
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 03:27:21PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> That is data that was freshly touched around the time the system went down, right?
>
> I.e. data that was probably half-modified by user-space to begin with.
It's data that wasn't synced out yet, yes. Which isn't the problem per
se. With ext3/4 in ordered mode, or xfs, or btrfs the file size won't
be incremented until the data is written. in ext3/4 in writeback mode
(or various non-journaling filesystems) however the inode size is
updated, and metadagta changes are logged. Besides exposing stale
data which is a security risk in multi-user systems it also means the
inode looks modified (by size and timestamps), but contains other data
than actually written.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists