[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101110152001.GA5707@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:20:02 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
andi@...stfloor.org, lwoodman@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing,mm - add kernel pagefault tracepoint for x86
& x86_64
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:17:50PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> I guess I can take the regs out then.. would that patch be acceptable
> afterwards..?
I really can't make much sense out of this whole trace point. What
use it the task_struct address for example?
What would be much more interesting is telling us if we had a
major/minor fault, if ->page_mkwrite was called, etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists