[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101110152812.GA14009@Krystal>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:28:12 -0500
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ying.huang@...el.com, bp@...en8.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mchehab@...hat.com,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/Requirements/Design] h/w error reporting
* Steven Rostedt (rostedt@...dmis.org) wrote:
[...]
> I added Mathieu too. I know to you LTTng does not exist, but he can at
> least give ideas about something we may not have thought about and may
> want to do in the future.
If we come up with an ABI that fulfills my user needs, I'll switch to it and
deprecate LTTng. I've actually worked almost full time on common kernel tracer
infrastructures this year, leaving LTTng development almost to a standing halt.
How do you guys want to proceed ? Do you want to throw your requirements over
the wall or do you want me to propose a trace format we can discuss on ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists