[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101110160211.GA2562@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:02:11 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage -
	kernel/pid.c:419 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
(another try with the proper email address)
On 11/09, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> Thank you, Oleg!  Greg, would you be willing to update your patch
> to remove the comment?  (Perhaps tasklist_lock as well...)
Agreed, I think tasklock should be killed.
But wait. Whatever we do, isn't this code racy? I do not see why, say,
sys_ioprio_set(IOPRIO_WHO_PROCESS) can't install ->io_context after
this task has already passed exit_io_context().
Jens, am I missed something?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
