[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1289410114.2084.23.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:28:34 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Raistlin <raistlin@...ux.it>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>, oleg@...hat.com,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>,
Johan Eker <johan.eker@...csson.com>,
"p.faure" <p.faure@...tech.ch>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>,
michael trimarchi <trimarchi@...is.sssup.it>,
Fabio Checconi <fabio@...dalf.sssup.it>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <cucinotta@...up.it>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>,
Nicola Manica <nicola.manica@...i.unitn.it>,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...is.sssup.it>,
Harald Gustafsson <hgu1972@...il.com>,
paulmck <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 02/22] sched: add extended scheduling interface
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 08:27 +0200, Raistlin wrote:
> +struct sched_param_ex {
> + int sched_priority;
> + struct timespec sched_runtime;
> + struct timespec sched_deadline;
> + struct timespec sched_period;
> + unsigned int sched_flags;
> +
> + struct timespec curr_runtime;
> + struct timespec used_runtime;
> + struct timespec curr_deadline;
> +};
It would be better for alignment reasons to move the sched_flags field
next to the sched_priority field.
I would suggest we add at least one more field so we can implement the
stochastic model from UNC, sched_runtime_dev or sched_runtime_var or
somesuch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists