[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101110002153.7af92a1f@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:21:53 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Security] [PATCH v3 0/4] x86: clear XD_DISABLED flag on Intel
to regain NX
> Only Intel has this problem (it's the only CPU that defines this MSR), so
> that'll reduce it. But Google is of no help to me on this; where can I find
> these documents?
www.intel.com 8)
> > I'm not specifically aware of any but I do know for example that there
> > are other CPU BIOS disablable features that some systems disable in the
> > BIOS for good reason (an ancient example being the original Pentium
> > REP MOVS optimisation on some steppings)
>
> By definition there should be fewer errata CPUs than those than need their
> BIOS ignored, so I still think this patch makes sense (especially since it
> can trivially be worked around with the noexec=off boot option).
We need to be sure because the last thing you want is even 1% of your 10%
of users to sudden get magical random memory corruption from overriding
something wrongly !
It's definitely worth checking and worth doing because even if there is
one (and I have no idea if there is) it'll tell you which steppings
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists