[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1289426753.13577.275.camel@Palantir>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:05:53 +0100
From: Raistlin <raistlin@...ux.it>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>, oleg@...hat.com,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>,
Johan Eker <johan.eker@...csson.com>,
"p.faure" <p.faure@...tech.ch>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>,
michael trimarchi <trimarchi@...is.sssup.it>,
Fabio Checconi <fabio@...dalf.sssup.it>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <cucinotta@...up.it>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>,
Nicola Manica <nicola.manica@...i.unitn.it>,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...is.sssup.it>,
Harald Gustafsson <hgu1972@...il.com>,
paulmck <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 02/22] sched: add extended scheduling interface
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 19:50 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > +int sched_setscheduler_ex(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
> > + const struct sched_param *param,
> > + const struct sched_param_ex *param_ex)
> > +{
> > + return __sched_setscheduler(p, policy, param, param_ex, true);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_setscheduler_ex);
>
> Do we really need to pass both params? Can't we simply create a struct
> sched_param_ex new_param = { .sched_priority = param->sched_priority };
> on stack and pass that?
>
We can. I'll do that way.
Thanks,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, ReTiS Lab, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa (Italy)
http://blog.linux.it/raistlin / raistlin@...ga.net /
dario.faggioli@...ber.org
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists