linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for November 10 (kernel/rcutiny)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:07:08 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 10 (kernel/rcutiny)

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 09:19:26AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:07:19 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Changes since 20101109:
> 
> 
> when CONFIG_RCU_BOOST is not enabled:
> 
> In file included from linux-next-20101110/kernel/rcutiny.c:53:
> linux-next-20101110/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h: In function 'rcu_preempt_cpu_qs':
> linux-next-20101110/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h:413: error: 'struct rcu_preempt_ctrlblk' has no member named 'n_normal_balk_blkd_tasks'

Hello, Randy,

Good catch!  Could you please try the following patch?

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

diff --git a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
index 297aa35..8cd197c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
@@ -297,9 +297,17 @@ static int rcu_boost(void)
  * the current grace period, and, if so, tell the rcu_kthread_task to
  * start boosting them.  If there is an expedited boost in progress,
  * we wait for it to complete.
+ *
+ * If there are no blocked readers blocking the current grace period,
+ * return 0 to let the caller know, otherwise return 1.  Note that this
+ * return value is independent of whether or not boosting was done.
  */
-static void rcu_initiate_boost(void)
+static int rcu_initiate_boost(void)
 {
+	if (!rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp()) {
+		RCU_TRACE(rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.n_normal_balk_blkd_tasks++);
+		return 0;
+	}
 	if (rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.gp_tasks != NULL &&
 	    rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.boost_tasks == NULL &&
 	    rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.boosted_this_gp == 0 &&
@@ -309,6 +317,7 @@ static void rcu_initiate_boost(void)
 		RCU_TRACE(rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.n_normal_boosts++);
 	} else
 		RCU_TRACE(rcu_initiate_boost_trace());
+	return 1;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -353,10 +362,13 @@ static int rcu_boost(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * If there is no RCU priority boosting, we don't initiate boosting.
+ * If there is no RCU priority boosting, we don't initiate boosting,
+ * but we do indicate whether there are blocked readers blocking the
+ * current grace period.
  */
-static void rcu_initiate_boost(void)
+static int rcu_initiate_boost(void)
 {
+	return rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp();
 }
 
 /*
@@ -405,12 +417,12 @@ static void rcu_preempt_cpu_qs(void)
 	/* If there is no GP then there is nothing more to do.  */
 	if (!rcu_preempt_gp_in_progress())
 		return;
-	/* If there are blocked readers, go check up on boosting. */
-	if (rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp()) {
-		rcu_initiate_boost();
+	/*
+	 * Check up on boosting.  If there are no readers blocking the
+	 * current grace period, leave.
+	 */
+	if (rcu_initiate_boost())
 		return;
-	} else
-		RCU_TRACE(rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.n_normal_balk_blkd_tasks++);
 
 	/* Advance callbacks. */
 	rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.completed = rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.gpnum;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/