[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=Nu=rncb8+BzEGtphEj452xwVTPPM+EbCz0Fm1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 21:16:33 -0500
From: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@...planet.net>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] drivers/gpu/drm/drm_stub.c: Use printf extension %pV
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> Using %pV reduces the number of printk calls and
> eliminates any possible message interleaving from
> other printk calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_stub.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_stub.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_stub.c
> index cdc89ee..e632527 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_stub.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_stub.c
> @@ -57,13 +57,21 @@ void drm_ut_debug_printk(unsigned int request_level,
> const char *function_name,
> const char *format, ...)
> {
> + struct va_format vaf;
> va_list args;
>
> if (drm_debug & request_level) {
> - if (function_name)
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "[%s:%s], ", prefix, function_name);
> va_start(args, format);
> - vprintk(format, args);
> +
> + vaf.fmt = format;
> + vaf.va = &args;
> +
> + if (function_name)
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "[%s:%s], %pV",
> + prefix, function_name, &vaf);
> + else
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "%pV", &vaf);
Wouldn't it be easier and more convenient to just make the %pV format
specifier just expect a format string and the va_arg list? Like this
printk(KERN_DEBUG "%pV", format, &args);
I mean, the %pV is kernel specific and we can just change how it works.
Kristian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists