linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] perf: sysfs type id

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1289360253.22787.51.camel@concordia>
Date:	Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:37:33 +1100
From:	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] perf: sysfs type id

On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 02:59 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:45, Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 02:19 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:10, Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 01:57 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >> >> Stay on the list please, with any possible reply. Thanks!
> >> >
> >> > You dropped the CC when you replied, or is my mailer being weird?
> >>
> >> You replied to me only:
> >>   From: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
> >>   To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
> >
> > Because you replied to me only, or at least that's what I see at my end.
> 
> Sure, I don't add lists back when people reply to me only. You never
> know why they do that, and if they have a reason for it. That's why I
> added the the same mail:
>   "Stay on the list please, with any possible reply. Thanks!"
> 
> >> Devices can never be on two subsystems at the same time. Not with
> >> classes, not with buses, that was never, and probably will never be
> >> possible.
> >
> > OK, I guess I'm getting my terminology wrong. My devices, which show up
> > in /sys/class/foo are symlinks into /sys/devices/virtual/foo, so they
> > _appear_ to be in two places.
> >
> > I also see entries for example in /sys/class/scsi_disk that link
> > into /sys/devices/pci.
> 
> Sure, all devices (devices are real directories) end up in the tree in
> /sys/devices/. That's one tree, where all the devices from different
> subsystems stack on top of others.
> 
> 
> All devices have a symlink called 'subsystem' which points back to the
> individual class the device belongs to.
> 
> To find all device of a specific subsystem, you start at the subsystem
> directory (class/bus) which collects them (only symlinks to the
> device, not directories).
> 
> That way you will find a blockdev, even when it's deep down in a chain
> of devices:
>   pci:bridge/pci:dev/scsi:host/scsi:target/scsi:lun/block

OK, I think I get it. Thanks for taking the time to explain it to me :)

cheers

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)