linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/9] x86: Unify node_to_cpumask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:11:23 +0200
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	yinghai@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] x86: Unify node_to_cpumask_map handling between 32
 and 64bit

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> x86_32 has been managing node_to_cpumask_map explicitly from
> map_cpu_to_node() and friends in a rather ugly way.  With previous
> changes, it's now possible to simply share the code with 64bit.
>
> * numa_add/remove_cpu() are moved from numa_64 to numa.
>
> * identify_cpu() now calls numa_add_cpu() for 32bit too.  This makes
>  the explicit mask management from map_cpu_to_node() unnecessary.
>
> * The whole x86_32 specific map_cpu_to_node() chunk is no longer
>  necessary.  Dropped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>

Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/