linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 3/4][v2] fsl_rio: move machine_check handler into machine_check_e500 & machine_check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Nov 2010 05:40:04 -0800
From:	"Bounine, Alexandre" <Alexandre.Bounine@....com>
To:	"Kumar Gala" <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
	"Xie Shaohui-B21989" <B21989@...escale.com>
Cc:	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"Li Yang-R58472" <R58472@...escale.com>,
	"Gala Kumar-B11780" <B11780@...escale.com>,
	"Zang Roy-R61911" <R61911@...escale.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/4][v2] fsl_rio: move machine_check handler into machine_check_e500 & machine_check_e500mc

Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > [Xie Shaohui-B21989] Hi Alex, seems your suggestion is some kind of
> > conflict with Kumar, you can have a look at
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/67774/
> 
> I think Alex's comment is the fact we ignore the 'return' value in the
machine_check_e500 case.

Yes, this one and plus the fact that Mchk exception messages are printed
even if it was handled successfully (by RIO handler). Messages are
printed in both: e500 and e500mc handlers.

Alex.
  
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/