linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/19]: SCST SYSFS interface implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:05:43 +0200
From:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC:	Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	scst-devel <scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
	Vu Pham <vuhuong@...lanox.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>,
	James Smart <James.Smart@...lex.Com>,
	Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@...co.com>, Andy Yan <ayan@...vell.com>,
	Chetan Loke <generationgnu@...oo.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@...il.com>,
	Daniel Henrique Debonzi <debonzi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/19]: SCST SYSFS interface implementation

On 11/11/2010 02:04 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:59:28AM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> 4. Exactly Like 3 but without the extra kref member
>>    Only x_put() changes and x_kref_release() now receives
>>    an x_object
>>
>> int x_put(struct object_x *x)
>> {
>> 	if (kobject_put(&x->kobj) == 1)
>> 		// Like above [3] x_kref_release()
>> 		x_kref_release(x);
>> }
> 
> This is racy, please never do this.
> 

The last ref belongs to the core code. 1 means there are no
more external clients on the object. So it can not race with
decrements. But I guess there is a possibility that it can
race with new increments. If it is the case that new increments
can only come from, say, sysfs access, then if we call the
x_put() == 1 after we are unregistered from sysfs and no new
users are allowed then the counter can only go down and we
have the last reference. No?

Like I said option 4 is delicate it must be done carefully.

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/