[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:31:27 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
esandeen@...hat.com, jmoyer@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clear PageError bit in msync & fsync
On 11/09/2010 04:07 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> Do we guarantee that the application will get EIO at least once? I
> thought there were issues where the error bit could get lost if the
> page writeback was triggered by sync() run by a third-party
> application.
Andrew, both the current kernel before and after my patch does
not guarantee the behaviour Ted has pointed out is required.
Johannes came up with a way to guarantee that - I'll send in
a patch for that today. That patch will obsolete the patch
I sent before (I don't think you've applied it yet).
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists