[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:12:59 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu, acme@...hat.com,
eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: Add support for extra parameters for raw
events
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:59:47PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 20:49 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > I think it would have parsed OK, but it is a confusing syntax to
> > > look at. I should point out that there are also the u,k,h modifiers
> > > which can be specified, even on raw events, so the full syntax looks
> > > something like:
> > >
> > > -e rXXXX[+YYYY][:u|:k|:h]
> >
> > Ok I can fix the help text for that.
>
> If we're frobbing it in the existing config qword, do we still need
> special syntax?
No, it could be all merged then.
>
> Also, I think we can use the same mechanism to program the
> PEBS-load-latency MSR, right?
I haven't looked at that, but if it's a per core resource
the infrastructure can be reused at least.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists