linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/FIX] perf-events: Put the per cpu state for intel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:29:17 +0100
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	fweisbec@...il.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...e.hu,
	acme@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/FIX] perf-events: Put the per cpu state for intel_pmu too

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 11/11/2010 6:54 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Andi Kleen<andi@...stfloor.org>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Small bug fix for the earlier offcore_response patch:
>>> need to put the events for intel_pmu too, not only core_pmu.
>>>
>> You don't need it for core pmu, this is for Core Duo/Solo
>> if I recall correctly.
>
> It shouldn't matter because Core Duo doesn't have any per CPU resources, but
> it seems more symetric to call it in any case.
>
There is no HT on these processors. I don't know of any valuable HW
features that is
not support for these.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/