[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101112093742.GA3537@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:37:43 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm,vmscan: Reclaim order-0 and compact instead of
lumpy reclaim when under light pressure
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 07:07:04PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> + if (COMPACTION_BUILD)
> + sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode = LUMPY_MODE_COMPACTION;
> + else
> + sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode = LUMPY_MODE_CONTIGRECLAIM;
>
Gack, I posted the slightly wrong version. This version prevents lumpy
reclaim ever being used. The figures I posted were for a patch where
this condition looked like
if (COMPACTION_BUILD && priority > DEF_PRIORITY - 2)
sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode = LUMPY_MODE_COMPACTION;
else
sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode = LUMPY_MODE_CONTIGRECLAIM;
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists