lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101112095739.GH18358@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:57:39 +0100
From:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@...ricsson.com>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Colin Cross <ccross@...gle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: nomadik: expand timesource to 63 bits

Hi John,

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:33:41PM -0800, john stultz wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Linus Walleij
> <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com> wrote:
> > After wraparound-problems in sched_clock() we expand the 32bit
> > timer in the MTU from 32 to 63 bits so the scheduling and
> > timeline is more stable. At current max operating frequency for
> > the MTU, 133 MHz, this should be sufficient for rougly 2200
> > years.
> >
> [snip]
> > What we need to know is whether it's OK to simply blow up
> > clocksource to 63 bits like this. In that case this
> > simplification should also apply to Orion, meaning that it
> > would base it's sched_clock() on the clocksource, using
> > simply clocksource_cyc2ns() cutting down the code
> > significantly.
> 
> I would advise against expanding the hardware counter to 63bits via
> software at the clocksource layer. This breaks the
> CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS flag rule (since the hardware will wrap
> below the mask value if not updated in the software layer). And as
> Thomas said, this will cause problems in the nohz idle limiting code
> (which makes sure we wake up before the clocksource wraps).
> 
> Instead, I'd use this extension at the sched_clock level, where it
> seems reasonable that it will be called frequently enough to not brake
> the cnt32_to_63 magic.
Instead of implementing sched_clock for each architecture seperatly,
wouldn't it be nice to have a generic sched_clock that uses the
architecture's clocksource?  I tried to implement that some time ago,
but tglx shoot it down because of locking problems.

Maybe doing that became easier since then?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ