lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7BC12C510D794F198DFA5A5C104CD7B6@wipblrx0099946>
Date:	Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:34:36 +0530
From:	"Hemanth V" <hemanthv@...com>
To:	"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@....ac.uk>,
	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:	"LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Manuel Stahl" <manuel.stahl@....fraunhofer.de>,
	"Jean Delvare" <khali@...ux-fr.org>, "Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>,
	"Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <drivers@...log.com>,
	<achew@...dia.com>, "Donggeun Kim" <dg77.kim@...sung.com>,
	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dtor@...l.ru>
Subject: Re: Sensor event related attribute naming.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hemanth V" <hemanthv@...com>
To: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@....ac.uk>; "Dmitry Torokhov" <dtor@...l.ru>


> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@....ac.uk>
> To: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@....ac.uk>
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 3:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Sensor event related attribute naming.
>
>
>> Given the lack of further comment, I went ahead and implemented the above 
>> naming
>> scheme for IIO. As the above discussion with Hemanth shows, there are 
>> some corner cases
>> that will need futher thought in the future.
>>
>
> Jonathan, haven't seen many comments on this. Do u think the reason
> might be that these interfaces are hidden behind a HAL layer like in 
> android and
> might not be a burning issue for many people.
>

Dmitry, could you let us know your thoughts on this too.
Would using a HAL layer be better compared to creating a standard
sysfs interface, as it seems to be the popular approach.

Thanks
Hemanth 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ