[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101112200333.GD11037@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:03:33 -0500
From: David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: ccaulfie@...hat.com, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dlm: Handle application limited situations properly.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 09:56:39PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>
> In the normal regime where an application uses non-blocking I/O
> writes on a socket, they will handle -EAGAIN and use poll() to
> wait for send space.
>
> They don't actually sleep on the socket I/O write.
>
> But kernel level RPC layers that do socket I/O operations directly
> and key off of -EAGAIN on the write() to "try again later" don't
> use poll(), they instead have their own sleeping mechanism and
> rely upon ->sk_write_space() to trigger the wakeup.
>
> So they do effectively sleep on the write(), but this mechanism
> alone does not let the socket layers know what's going on.
>
> Therefore they must emulate what would have happened, otherwise
> TCP cannot possibly see that the connection is application window
> size limited.
>
> Handle this, therefore, like SUNRPC by setting SOCK_NOSPACE and
> bumping the ->sk_write_count as needed when we hit the send buffer
> limits.
>
> This should make TCP send buffer size auto-tuning and the
> ->sk_write_space() callback invocations actually happen.
Thanks, pushed to
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/teigland/dlm.git#next
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists