[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xr93pquaxoll.fsf@ninji.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:40:22 -0800
From: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] memcg: simplify mem_cgroup_page_stat()
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:24:29AM -0800, Greg Thelen wrote:
>> The cgroup given to mem_cgroup_page_stat() is no allowed to be
>> NULL or the root cgroup. So there is no need to complicate the code
>> handling those cases.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
>> ---
>> mm/memcontrol.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>> 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> index eb621ee..f8df350 100644
>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> @@ -1364,12 +1364,10 @@ memcg_hierarchical_free_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
>>
>> /*
>> * mem_cgroup_page_stat() - get memory cgroup file cache statistics
>> - * @mem: optional memory cgroup to query. If NULL, use current task's
>> - * cgroup.
>> + * @mem: memory cgroup to query
>> * @item: memory statistic item exported to the kernel
>> *
>> - * Return the accounted statistic value or negative value if current task is
>> - * root cgroup.
>> + * Return the accounted statistic value.
>> */
>> long mem_cgroup_page_stat(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>> enum mem_cgroup_nr_pages_item item)
>> @@ -1377,29 +1375,27 @@ long mem_cgroup_page_stat(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>> struct mem_cgroup *iter;
>> long value;
>>
>> + VM_BUG_ON(!mem);
>> + VM_BUG_ON(mem_cgroup_is_root(mem));
>> +
>> get_online_cpus();
>> - rcu_read_lock();
>> - if (!mem)
>> - mem = mem_cgroup_from_task(current);
>> - if (__mem_cgroup_has_dirty_limit(mem)) {
>
> What about mem->use_hierarchy that is checked in
> __mem_cgroup_has_dirty_limit()? Is it no longer needed?
It is no longer needed because the callers of mem_cgroup_page_stat()
call __mem_cgroup_has_dirty_limit(). In the current implementation, if
use_hierarchy=1 then the cgroup does not have dirty limits, so calls
into mem_cgroup_page_stat() are avoided. Specifically the callers of
mem_cgroup_page_stat() are:
1. mem_cgroup_dirty_info() which calls __mem_cgroup_has_dirty_limit()
and returns false if use_hierarchy=1.
2. throttle_vm_writeout() which calls mem_dirty_info() ->
mem_cgroup_dirty_info() -> __mem_cgroup_has_dirty_limit() will fall
back to global limits if use_hierarchy=1.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists