[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101112.131817.27796671.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:18:17 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: equinox@...c24.net
Cc: kaber@...sh.net, eric.dumazet@...il.com, eparis@...hat.com,
hzhong@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
pekkas@...core.fi, jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
paul.moore@...com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] network: return errors if we know tcp_connect
failed
From: David Lamparter <equinox@...c24.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 22:16:27 +0100
> As food for thought I'd like to pose the following rule:
> iptables -A OUTPUT -m statistic --mode nth --every 5 -j DROP
> which should, to my understanding, still allow the connect to complete,
> even if the first SYN got (silently!...) dropped.
Yes, I agree and this is pretty much the point I tried to make
earlier.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists