[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101113131537.GB26105@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 13:15:37 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Atul Sowani <sowani@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, alan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.36 1/1] kernel SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED changed to
__SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED()
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 05:28:29PM +0530, Atul Sowani wrote:
> Atul Sowani wrote:
> > There are still some files containing .lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED type
> > assignments which should be converted to __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Atul Sowani <sowani@...il.com>
> > ---
> >
> > diff -uprN a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c 2010-10-21 02:00:22.000000000 +0530
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c 2010-11-07 00:47:32.000000000 +0530
> > @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ struct ipi_data {
> > };
> >
> > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct ipi_data, ipi_data) = {
> > - .lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED,
> > + .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED (ipi_data.lock),
No space between UNLOCKED and (.
> I made original patch submission on 08.Nov.2010. I am wondering if
> this patch will be useful and is correct. Please comment.
This is the first I've seen of this patch. For the ARM part, with the
above fixed:
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists