[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1289677083.2109.167.camel@laptop>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 20:38:02 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Shailabh Nagar <nagar1234@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
John stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 4/7] taskstats: Add per task steal time
accounting
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 18:03 +0100, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Currently steal time is only accounted for the whole system. With this
> patch we add steal time to the per task CPU time accounting.
> The triplet "user time", "system time" and "steal time" represents
> all consumed CPU time on hypervisor based systems.
Does that really make sense? Its not like the hypervisor really knows
anything about tasks and won't steal from one? Its really a vcpu
feature.
What added benefit will all this extra accounting give?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists