[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CDF125E.3050803@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 23:34:06 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/20] x86/ticketlock: Use C for __ticket_spin_unlock
On 11/13/2010 11:05 AM, Américo Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:59:44AM -0400, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> * On PPro SMP or if we are using OOSTORE, we use a locked operation to unlock
>> * (PPro errata 66, 92)
>> */
>> -# define UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX LOCK_PREFIX
>> +static __always_inline void __ticket_unlock_release(struct arch_spinlock *lock)
>> +{
>> + if (sizeof(lock->tickets.head) == sizeof(u8))
>> + asm (LOCK_PREFIX "incb %0"
>> + : "+m" (lock->tickets.head) : : "memory");
>> + else
>> + asm (LOCK_PREFIX "incw %0"
>> + : "+m" (lock->tickets.head) : : "memory");
>
> This 'if/else' really should be done with #ifdef, even though
> the compiler may be smart enough to remove it.
That's a sure path to bitrot.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists