linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH UPDATED 1/5] mtd: fix bdev exclusive open bugs in block2mtd::add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CDE73EB.2090208@kernel.org>
Date:	Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:18:03 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	dedekind1@...il.com
CC:	axboe@...nel.dk, hch@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	petero2@...ia.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, jack@...e.cz, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, tytso@....edu, mfasheh@...e.com,
	joel.becker@...cle.com, aelder@....com, dm-devel@...hat.com,
	drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, neilb@...e.de, leochen@...adcom.com,
	sbranden@...adcom.com, chris.mason@...cle.com, swhiteho@...hat.com,
	shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, joern@...fs.org,
	konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp, reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 1/5] mtd: fix bdev exclusive open bugs in block2mtd::add_device()

Hello,

On 11/13/2010 12:14 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 11:59 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> There are two bdev exclusive open bugs.
>>
>> * open_bdev_exclusive() must not be called with NULL holder.  Use dev
>>   as the holder.
>>
>> * open_by_devnum() doesn't open the bdev exclusively but
>>   block2mtd_free_device() always assumes it.  Explicitly claim the
>>   bdev.
>>
>> The latter is rather clumsy but will be simplified with future
>> blkdev_get/put() cleanups.
>>
>> - Updated to use local variable @mode to cache FMODE_* masks as
>>   suggested by Artem Bityutskiy.
> 
> Do you want this patch to go in via Jens' tree with the rest of the
> series, or as an independent patch via the mtd tree?

It probably would be easier if this is routed through Jens' tree as
it's necessary for later patches in the series, but this being a fix,
this should be merged during this cycle rather than the next one.
Jens, how do you want to proceed?

Thank you.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/