[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1289778189.5154.10.camel@maggy.simson.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 16:43:09 -0700
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty task groups
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 12:48 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> <markus@...ppelsdorf.de> wrote:
> > On 2010.11.14 at 12:20 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >>
> >> It isn't like it's some traditional kernel debug feature that makes
> >> things slower or adds tons of debug output.
> >
> > It also enables the sched_autogroup_handler, that you disliked seeing in
> > the previous version.
>
> Yes, but that one exists only to make things "exact". I don't really
> see why it exists. What's the point of doing the task movement, if the
> group information is just going to be ignored anyway?
Not only. pinned tasks would stay in their autogroup until somebody
moved them to a cgroup. Them wandering back over time would be fine,
and all but pinned tasks will.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists