[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CDFA2FC.40603@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 09:51:08 +0100
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Bruno Randolf <br1@...fach.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com, peterz@...radead.org, blp@...stanford.edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lars_Ericsson@...ia.com,
kevin.granade@...il.com,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] Add generic exponentially weighted moving average
(EWMA) function
KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>> Why do ewma_init() and ewma_add() return their first argument? They look
>>> to me like they can be straight-forward void functions.
>> You are right, for ewma_init() it does not make sense.
>>
>> For ewma_add() I think it does. This has been discussed before (e.g.
>> http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2010-10/msg09124.html).
>> Some people might want to get the value when they add a sample by using
>> ewma_get(ewma_add(&ewma, val));
>
> ewma_add(&ewma, val);
> ewma_get(&ewma);
>
> is enough simpler and cleaner. I don't oppse this :)
There are more candidate colors for the bike shed: :-)
- an ewma_add_return could do what ewma_get(ewma_add(...)) is meant for,
- or ewma_add itself could return the result.
BTW, isn't "get" more usually used as a prefix for these kinds of functions in
kernel APIs? "get" as a suffix more often means "get a reference" alias
increase reference count rather than "get the value".
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- =-== -===-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists