[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CE0B54E.6000101@zytor.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 20:21:34 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>,
Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86: OLPC: speed up device tree creation during boot
(v2)
On 11/14/2010 01:50 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> It's being frowned upon btw, because it's easy to overlook (and for other reasons) -
> please dont use statics inside functions - please put them in front of the function
> or further up into file scope.
>
What? What is wrong with static variables in functions? It really
doesn't seem to be a good idea to make them file-scope if they don't
need to be.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists