| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <AANLkTim0vCJkMoH5P0wCN9J6340rDsscyNBQ+R+_ph8m@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:19:48 +0900 From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com> To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> Cc: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rsync@...ts.samba.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> Subject: Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof) On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:09 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote: >> > Because we have an alternative solution already. please try memcgroup :) >> >> I think memcg could be a solution of them but fundamental solution is >> that we have to cure it in VM itself. >> I feel it's absolutely absurd to enable and use memcg for amending it. >> >> I wonder what's the problem in Peter's patch 'drop behind'. >> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg179576.html >> >> Could anyone tell me why it can't accept upstream? > > I don't know the reason. And this one looks reasonable to me. I'm curious the above > patch solve rsync issue or not. > Minchan, have you tested it yourself? Still yet. :) If we all think it's reasonable, it would be valuable to adjust it with current mmotm and see the effect. > > > -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists