[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101115092655.GG27362@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 09:26:55 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm,compaction: Add COMPACTION_BUILD
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 02:45:07PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > To avoid #ifdef COMPACTION in a following patch, this patch adds
> > COMPACTION_BUILD that is similar to NUMA_BUILD in operation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
> > ---
> > include/linux/kernel.h | 7 +++++++
> > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > index 450092c..c00c5d1 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > @@ -826,6 +826,13 @@ struct sysinfo {
> > #define NUMA_BUILD 0
> > #endif
> >
> > +/* This helps us avoid #ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION
> > +#define COMPACTION_BUILD 1
> > +#else
> > +#define COMPACTION_BUILD 0
> > +#endif
> > +
>
> Looks good, of cource. but I think this patch can be fold [3/3] beucase
> it doesn't have any change.
>
Ok, I can do that.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists