[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101115093446.GA15936@riccoc20.at.omicron.at>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:34:46 +0100
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/8] Dynamic clock devices
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:01:04PM -0800, john stultz wrote:
> That said, given how different this is from the last implementation, I'm
> not fully clear I see how to integrate this into my patch set. It might
> be useful to see a trivial example of how you see a clockdevice being
> registered and used.
Okay, I will post again, with the PTP code as user of the new layer.
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists