[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1289829658.16406.78.camel@maggy.simson.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 07:00:58 -0700
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty task groups
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 19:12 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I'm also very happy with just what it does to interactive performance.
> Admittedly, my "testcase" is really trivial (reading email in a
> web-browser, scrolling around a bit, while doing a "make -j64" on the
> kernel at the same time), but it's a test-case that is very relevant
> for me. And it is a _huge_ improvement.
Next logical auto-step would be to try to subvert cfq. At a glance,
io_context looks highly hackable for !CONFIG_CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED case.
The other case may get interesting for someone not very familiar with
cfq innards, but I see a tempting looking subversion point.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists