[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101115140739.GJ7269@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:07:39 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atomic: add atomic_inc_not_zero_hint()
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 07:57:10AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 01:14:12PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > >
> > > prefetchw() would be too much overhead?
> >
> > No idea. Where do you believe that prefetchw() should be added?
>
> It is another way to get an exclusive cache line
> for situations like this. No need to give a hint.
prefetchw doesn't work on Intel (or rather is equivalent to prefetch),
for Intel you always need to explicitely write to get an exclusive
line.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists