[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1011151018380.1606-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:20:21 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [GIT PULL] One more power management fix for 2.6.37
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> What about applying the patch below now and moving to the multiple list heads
> approach in the next cycle?
>
> Rafael
>
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> Subject: PM: Allow devices to be removed during late suspend and early resume
>
> Holding dpm_list_mtx across late suspend and early resume of devices
> is problematic for the PCMCIA subsystem and doesn't allow device
> objects to be removed by late suspend and early resume driver
> callbacks. This appears to be overly restrictive, as drivers are
> generally allowed to remove device objects in other phases of suspend
> and resume. Therefore rework dpm_{suspend|resume}_noirq() so that
> they don't have to hold dpm_list_mtx all the time.
This looks okay to me. Just like the other routines.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists