[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101115155928.GC345@dumpdata.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:59:28 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xen: add CPU microcode update driver
> +static enum ucode_state xen_request_microcode_user(int cpu,
> + const void __user *buf, size_t size)
> +{
> + struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
> + struct xen_microcode *uc;
> + enum ucode_state ret;
> + size_t unread;
> +
> + if (cpu != 0) {
> + /* No real firmware for non-zero cpus; just store a
> + placeholder */
> + size = 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (uci->mc != NULL) {
> + vfree(uci->mc);
> + uci->mc = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = UCODE_ERROR;
> + uc = vmalloc(sizeof(*uc) + size);
> + if (uc == NULL)
> + goto out;
> +
> + uc->len = size;
> +
> + ret = UCODE_NFOUND;
> +
> + /* XXX This sporadically returns uncopied bytes, so we return
> + EFAULT. As far as I can see, the usermode code
^^^^^ UCODE_NFOUND.
> + (microcode_ctl) isn't doing anything wrong... */
Is this still valid? Looking at AMD it checks for a magic key and the Intel
just copies without checks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists