linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] fsldma: add support to 36-bit physical address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:13:58 -0600
From:	Timur Tabi <timur.tabi@...il.com>
To:	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fsldma: add support to 36-bit physical address

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:

> The programming model (if you look at the free-space in the registers and data structures) supports a 64-bit address.  I'm trying to avoid changing the driver in the future if we have >36-bit.  However this is such a minor worry that I'll stop and just ack the patch as is.

I must still be missing something.  I'm looking at the description of
the SATR register in the MPC8572 RM, and it shows this:

0 - 3 |   4 - 5   |     6     |   7  |   8 - 11  |   12 - 15  | 16-21 | 22-31
 ---  | STFLOWLVL | SPCIORDER | SSME | STRANSINT | SREADTTYPE |  ---  |  ESAD

The most that we can extend ESAD to is 16 bits, for a total of a
48-bit physical address.  Where are the other 16 bits supposed to go?

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/