[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1289843312.2109.518.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:48:32 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Shailabh Nagar <nagar1234@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
John stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
"jeremy.fitzhardinge" <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 4/7] taskstats: Add per task steal time
accounting
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 18:42 +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> Would you prefer another #ifdef orgy to
> avoid the overhead for VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=n? We can certainly do
> that.
>
That still doesn't answer the question, why do you want this? What is
per task steal time accounting good for? What problem is being solved?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists