[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinSpmjL+eK+UHSViETJn8uqcSE63Zi8XUKnmfPi@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:53:20 +0100
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
scst-devel <scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
Vu Pham <vuhuong@...lanox.com>,
James Smart <James.Smart@...lex.com>,
Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@...co.com>, Andy Yan <ayan@...vell.com>,
Chetan Loke <generationgnu@...oo.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@...il.com>,
Daniel Henrique Debonzi <debonzi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/19]: SCST SYSFS interface implementation
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> [ ... ]
> This is quite unfortunate as I still have not seen the public comparison
> of the 2 implementations and the lists of benefits and shortfalls for
> both of them.
The reason why we are proposing SCST for upstream inclusion are:
- It has a large user base.
- The project is known for its high performance, low latency I/O and
excellent stability.
- A feature-wise overview can be found here:
http://scst.sourceforge.net/comparison.html.
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists