linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix dmesg_restrict build failure with CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y and CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:16:26 +1100 (EST)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@...nel.org>,
	Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix dmesg_restrict build failure with CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y
 and CONFIG_PRINTK=n

On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org> wrote:
> >
> > I'm sure somebody somewhere hates it, but I was thinking something
> > like the attached.
> 
> I certainly like it. If the old rule should have been that you _have_
> to call cap_syslog(), then just eviscerating that entirely and putting
> it in the generic code is definitely the right thing.
> 
> Anyway, I wanted to do -rc2 yesterday, but I don't really want this
> kernel build problem to remain (even if it's not a very relevant
> config for most people).
> 
> So if people can quickly agree on this, I'll take it and do -rc2 later
> today, otherwise I'll do Joe's trivial patch as a stop-gap measure
> pending approval for cleanup/fixing the security interfaces.

Looks good to me:

Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>


(I'd really like to see new security features get fully reviewed on the 
LSM list and bake in -next for a while in the future, no matter how 
obviously correct they seem).


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/