[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00a101cb8571$45165040$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:33:01 +0900
From: "Tomoya MORINAGA" <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>
To: "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: "Wolfgang Grandegger" <wg@...ndegger.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Wolfram Sang" <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
"Christian Pellegrin" <chripell@...e.org>,
"Barry Song" <21cnbao@...il.com>,
"Samuel Ortiz" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
<socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<andrew.chih.howe.khor@...el.com>, <qi.wang@...el.com>,
<margie.foster@...el.com>, <yong.y.wang@...el.com>,
"Masayuki Ohtake" <masa-korg@....okisemi.com>,
<kok.howg.ewe@...el.com>, <joel.clark@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] can: Topcliff: PCH_CAN driver: Add Flow control,
Hi Marc,
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 5:14 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote :
> Sorry, but there is little chance to get a "this patch changes about 10
> things" into the kernel, please try to split up the patch.
Why !? I say again, it takes much time.
This doesn't make sense, does this?
Have I already updated almost your indications?
How about the following procedure?
I think the latest patch is pretty better than upstream's.
Thus, firstly, could you accept the latest patch ?
After this, I will post patch per topic.
---
Thanks,
Tomoya MORINAGA
OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists