linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:06:21 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
cc:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>, Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>,
	Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...gle.com>,
	"Figo.zhang" <figo1802@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series

On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Jesper Juhl wrote:

> [jj@...gon ~]$ uname -a
> Linux dragon 2.6.37-rc1-ARCH-00542-g0143832-dirty #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Nov 15 22:01:52 CET 2010 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7250 @ 2.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
> [jj@...gon ~]$ dmesg | grep oom_adj
> start_kdeinit (1502): /proc/1502/oom_adj is deprecated, please use /proc/1502/oom_score_adj instead.
> [jj@...gon ~]$ /usr/lib/kde4/libexec/start_kdeinit --version
> 
> Qt: 4.7.1
> KDE: 4.5.3 (KDE 4.5.3)
> 

Thanks for the report!  I'll get involved with kde-devel and send a patch 
to remove this dependency on newer kernels to expedite the process.

 [ Others with reports of deprecated use of oom_adj can contact me 
   privately and I'll find the parties of interest to avoid topics 
   unrelated to the kernel itself on LKML. ]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/